Re: [Gems-users] memory accesses


Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:14:49 -0400
From: Polina Dudnik <pdudnik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] memory accesses


On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Are you running golden or silver checkpoints? Golden checkpoints shouldn't
>> require you to create processor sets, only silver. I don't see how creating
>> processor sets inside your program would be a problem but I don't know of
>> anyone doing that. In general, you should create processor sets by issuing
>> commands in the .simics file.
I don't have golden or silver checkpoints. I think those are internal
to Wisconsin. I've created my own checkpoints with solaris 10
installed. I'm creating processor sets before transaction begin. I
will try to create processor sets in .simics file, do you think this
is causing problem.


>> Are you sure that the number of threads you are trying to run is at least
>> one fewer than the number of processors?
I'm just running two threads on 8 processors.

BTW thanks for rapid replies...

Oh, no problem at all. Yes, you must make sure that you are creating and binding the processors correctly. See, if that works and make sure that the id you bind starts with one, not zero.

 

Shakeel
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.


[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]