Mailing List ArchivesPublic Access |
![[Computer Systems Lab]](https://www-auth.cs.wisc.edu/pics/csl_logo.gif){kind=logo}
|
Mailing List ArchivesPublic Access |
|
| Date: | Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:37:31 +0330 |
|---|---|
| From: | Mahmood Naderan <mahmood.nt@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor |
Hi, Why it is not possible for GEMS to work with an in-order processor model? Mahmood Naderan, |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] Cache reference and its associated processor id, Liz Joy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor, Muhammad abid Mughal |
| Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] =?x-gbk?q?Re=3A_=5BGems-users=5D_how_to_inject_error_?==?x-gbk?q?when_i_do_fault_recovery_research=A3=BF?=, Greg Byrd |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor, Muhammad abid Mughal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |