[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] Preemption question
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:00:57 -0500
- From: Erik Paulson <epaulson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Preemption question
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:36:59AM +0100, Bruce Beckles wrote:
> But an additional thought - and I'm speculating here - it would make sense
> to me if it turned out to be the case that the negotiator might look at a
> startd that was already running a job if it was trying to match a
> different job that had been submitted by the _same_ user. I.e. when
> trying to match jobs to startds for user A, the negotiator might say,
> something like "I'll consider idle startds and then startds claimed by
> user A when trying to match this job".
> That's pure speculation on my part - I may be completely wrong.
The negotiator doesn't do anything special for startds claimed by the same
user. The scenario outlined above doesn't happen.