[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] Groups with weighted slots in 7.6.9
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:13:27 -0400
- From: William Strecker-Kellogg <willsk@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Groups with weighted slots in 7.6.9
We were running with regroup in 7.4 but since going to 7.6 using surplus
has been very helpful to us. I don't think we'd be willing to run
without it, however the groups that have accept_surplus turned on don't
absolutely need to be jobs with weight != 1, although someday we may
want them to be.
On 09/12/2012 04:35 PM, Erik Erlandson wrote:
>> I take that back, as soon as I turned one group in my test hgq-tree with
>> accept_surplus on, I see exactly the same behavior as in 7.6!
> Enabling accept_surplus[_*] for any group "turns off" the fix in
> question. The reason is that surplus sharing works by taking unused
> quota from one group and sharing it to another. That logic involves
> negotiating with the "allocated" portion of the quotas, as opposed to
> the original configured quota.
> If you run a configuration without any accept_surplus, your problem
> should go away. If that is not an option, I'll have to give some
> thought to the problem.
> Do you want surplus sharing, or do you want autoregroup? (The two were
> briefly synonyms, but I have since restored the original semantics of