[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HTCondor-users] bug in schedd_negotiate.cpp - 144-core startd
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:10:21 -0500
- From: Michael V Pelletier <Michael.V.Pelletier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] bug in schedd_negotiate.cpp - 144-core startd
wrote on 11/19/2015 04:47:13 PM:
> From: Thomas Hartmann <thomas.hartmann@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: 11/19/2015 04:50 PM
> hi ben,
> sorry, i was not aware of the ticket. thanks for letting me know!
By the way, Thomas, are these the Xeon E7-8890v3 processors
(or 70, or 80) in a four-socket ProLiant, or maybe an SGI UV system?
I - and probably others - would be interested if you
could weigh in on the cost/benefit factors that went into your decision
to configure the machine that way.
We've been eyeing those 18-core chips, in particular
the E5-2699v3 for the HP DL360's and BladeSystems we like to use around
here, but the fact that they cost over $6,000 each means that you can usually
get the same number of cores more cheaply by using slightly lower density
processors in a slightly larger number of systems.