Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:04:17 -0400 |
---|---|
From: | "Juyoung Jung" <juyoung.jung@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | [Gems-users] Necessity of NP state |
Dear All, I am working on a MESI_SCMP_tiledL2bank_directory protocol, and not seeing the evident difference between NP state and I state. Referring the previous post from https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/2007-January/msg00019.shtml, I couldn't understand why NP state should be needed. Could you give me an advice? I will appreciate to it if I can hear any response. Best Regards, Young |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] simics 3 setup, arrvindh shriraman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Necessity of NP state, hongxia sun |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] MessageBuffer assertion, Mike Marty |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Necessity of NP state, hongxia sun |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |