Re: [Gems-users] Necessity of NP state


Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:10:48 +0800
From: "hongxia sun" <sunhx.seraph@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] Necessity of NP state
You can remove it in your protocol. But you'd better modify ruby/system/CacheMemory.h at the same time.

2007/6/22, Juyoung Jung <juyoung.jung@xxxxxxxxx>:
Dear All,


I am working on a MESI_SCMP_tiledL2bank_directory protocol, and not seeing the evident difference between NP state and I state.
Referring the previous post from https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/2007-January/msg00019.shtml , I couldn't understand why NP state should be needed.
Could you give me an advice? I will appreciate to it if I can hear any response.



Best Regards,


Young


_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site: https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.



[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]