Date: | Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:34:31 -0600 |
---|---|
From: | Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] Opal: Lack of forward progress detected |
Francesco, You should give a lot of scrutiny to your Ruby modifications. You can start by running Ruby's random tester for awhile. It is possible that your additions/modifications break Ruby when there are multiple concurrent requests from each processor in the memory system (i.e. with opal or the tester) but not when each processor limits itself to a single request (i.e. Simics+Ruby only). Regards, Dan On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Francesco Panicucci <panasa1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi all, -- http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq! |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] Opal: Lack of forward progress detected, Francesco Panicucci |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] Checkpoints, Edward Lee |
Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] Opal: Lack of forward progress detected, Francesco Panicucci |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] PRIV_MODE conflict with Store_XACT, Lois Orosa Nogueira |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |