[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Condor-users] questions about remote queue submission
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:21:57 +0800 (HKT)
- From: "Carson Hung" <carson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Condor-users] questions about remote queue submission
sorry for replying this email twice.
I forgot to send out one of the noticable differences between -r and -n
option of remote submission.
I found out that for -r option, the local machine seems to forward the
credential(proxy one) of the local user to the remote scheduler, but not
the -n option. So I think -n and -r should have no differences for condor
(cluster submission), but will have differences for condor-g (grid
>> does anyone succeed in sending jobs to remote queues/schedulers?
> See my email titled "condor_submit with -r or -n?" from Monday. I have
> succesfully submitted to a remote schedd and had the job run
> successfully using the -n option. This was from a WinXP to a WinXP
> machine running 6.7.3. I think -n worked by slight fluke. We have
> SEC_DEFAULT_NEGOTIATION = NEVER at our site. If I used the -r option
> (which is what I think I should be doing) I crashed the remote schedd
> (not good). But I think -r is what most people should use. I haven't
> tried it from linux to linux or linux to windows.
> No one has answered my question abou the differences between -r and -n
> -- the documentation is very sparse. The docs made -n sound like it was
> only for distinguishing between multiple schedd instances on a machine,
> but it worked for a remote submission for me.
> - Ian
> Condor-users mailing list