RE: [Condor-users] questions about remote queue submission

["Carson Hung" <carson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ian,

sorry for replying this email twice.
I forgot to send out one of the noticable differences between -r and -n
option of remote submission.

I found out that for -r option, the local machine seems to forward the
credential(proxy one) of the local user to the remote scheduler, but not
the -n option. So I think -n and -r should have no differences for condor
(cluster submission), but will have differences for condor-g (grid
submission).

Thanks,
Carson

>
>> does anyone succeed in sending jobs to remote queues/schedulers?
>
> See my email titled "condor_submit with -r or -n?" from Monday. I have
> succesfully submitted to a remote schedd and had the job run
> successfully using the -n option. This was from a WinXP to a WinXP
> machine running 6.7.3. I think -n worked by slight fluke. We have
> SEC_DEFAULT_NEGOTIATION = NEVER at our site. If I used the -r option
> (which is what I think I should be doing) I crashed the remote schedd
> (not good). But I think -r is what most people should use. I haven't
> tried it from linux to linux or linux to windows.
>
> No one has answered my question abou the differences between -r and -n
> -- the documentation is very sparse. The docs made -n sound like it was
> only for distinguishing between multiple schedd instances on a machine,
> but it worked for a remote submission for me.
>
> - Ian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> Condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users