[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] Quill vs. Quill++
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:16:14 -0400
- From: "Robert E. Parrott" <parrott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Quill vs. Quill++
Thanks for the responses, folks.
Can a Condor team member confirm this, and suggest an approach to
moving forward with implementing Quill on our systems?
If the schemas really are different, then I have some concerns about
using quill in the present stable series.
We hope to be using condor and quill into the future, but need some
insight for planning.
On Oct 24, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Ian Chesal wrote:
As I understand it, there is "Quill" and there's "Quill++" which
talks to all condor daemons and not just schedd. What is the status
of Quill++, and where would one find it.
As I understand it the next generation of Quill (is it still being
called Quill++?) is a 6.9.x project right now. The daemon is the
both cases (condor_quill). You just use configuration variables to
it from logging the schedd queues to logging everything in the system.
Also, Quill is included in v6.8.6 and v6.9.4. What is the difference
in codebase there as far as Quill is concerned?
Confidentiality Notice. This message may contain information that
is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution,
or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you.
Condor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
The archives can be found at: