[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [HTCondor-users] Odd behavior of condor_master in SL7

OK, then, to summarize, as my good friend Jeff would say, "it is what it is".


On 12/4/2017 5:26 PM, Thomas Patrick Downes wrote:
I do not hesitate to point out to people the following:

âDuring the life cycle of a major release, Red Hat makes commercially reasonable efforts to maintain binary compatibility for the core runtime environment across all minor releases and errata advisoriesâ

This is a commonly-used legal term that I understand to more or less mean, âweâll do it unless we lose money on it.â This is a perfectly reasonable approach to take, but people treat RHELâs ABI promises as having value in and of itself, while RedHat, when it comes down to it, doesnât.


On 12/4/17, 4:08 PM, "HTCondor-users on behalf of Dimitri Maziuk" <htcondor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of dmaziuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

     On 12/04/2017 03:43 PM, Michael Pelletier wrote:
> "All your daemon are belong to us. You are on the way to SystemD. You have no chance to survive make your time. Ha ha ha ha..." I have to say, between RedHat breaking kernel ABI on every point release
     in 7 series (kills zfs) and systemd exorcising all my daemon (kills nfs
     cluster failovers among other things), freebsd is looking better and
     better every day... and it can run docker apparently, too, for all those
     GNapps we all can't live without.
     Dimitri Maziuk
     BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu

HTCondor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting

The archives can be found at: