[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [HTCondor-users] automatic selection of advertised IP



I only have ALLOW_WRITE set to a non-default value on the central manager. In that instance, I have it set to

ALLOW_WRITE Â Â Â Â = $(ALLOW_WRITE) $(NEMO_SUBNET)

So I think you may be allowing more WRITE than is truly necessary. The comments in my config suggest ALLOW_WRITE is necessary on the execute nodes if users want to run condor_checkpoint manually.

--
Tom Downes
Senior Scientist and Data CenterÂManager
Center for Gravitation, Cosmology and Astrophysics
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
414.229.2678

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:29 PM, John M Knoeller <johnkn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In 8.6, metaknobs allow arguments, and they can be optional So how about something like this:

Â

use SECURITY : HOST_BASED_PRIVATE_NETWORK(192.168.0.0/21)

 or

use SECURITY : HOST_BASED_PRIVATE_NETWORK(192.168.0.0/21, NEMONET)

Â

which would expand to

Â

ÂÂÂ use SECURITY : HOST_BASED

ÂÂÂ ALLOW_WRITE = $(1) $(ALLOW_WRITE)

ÂÂÂ ALLOW_READ = $(1) $(ALLOW_READ)

ÂÂÂ BIND_ALL_INTERFACES = false

ÂÂÂ If $(2?)

ÂÂÂÂÂÂ PRIVATE_NETWORK_INTERFACE = $(1)

ÂÂÂÂÂÂ PRIVATE_NETWORK_NAME = $(2)

ÂÂÂÂÂÂ # set this just so that we can easily reference the private network ip range in other config knobs.

ÂÂÂÂÂÂ $(2)_SUBNET = $(1)

ÂÂÂ Endif

Â

Iâm told that setting NETWORK_INTERFACE can be left at the default of * when PRIVATE_NETWORK_INTERFACE is set.

Â

-tj

Â

From: HTCondor-users [mailto:htcondor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Downes
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 5:12 PM
To: HTCondor-Users Mail List <htcondor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] automatic selection of advertised IP

Â

Aha.

Â

Â

I realize IP-based security is more a security blanket than a security posture, but I'd wager it's the dominant model in use. Worth making the simple cases simple to configure.


--

Tom Downes
Senior Scientist and Data CenterÂManager
Center for Gravitation, Cosmology and Astrophysics
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
414.229.2678

Â

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Tom Downes <downes@xxxxxxx> wrote:

I swear a put together a ticket which suggested whittling down these knobs so that you could effectively do

Â

use SECURITY:HOST_BASED

PRIVATE_SUBNET =Â172.20.0.0/23

Â

and be "done" in the sense of having implemented something that is marginally better than nothing but also reliable.


--

Tom Downes
Senior Scientist and Data CenterÂManager
Center for Gravitation, Cosmology and Astrophysics
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
414.229.2678

Â

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Todd L Miller <tlmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

# ensure all communication occurs over private network
# may need to tweak when setting up flocking
BIND_ALL_INTERFACES = False
NETWORK_INTERFACEÂ Â= 172.20.*
PRIVATE_NETWORK_NAMEÂ Â Â = NEMONET
PRIVATE_NETWORK_INTERFACE = 172.20.*


    You probably don't actually need the PRIVATE_NETWORK_* bits with BIND_ALL_INTERFACES and NETWORK_INTERFACE set that way. I think the reverse is true as well (that HTCondor prefers matching named private networks over everything else), but I guess getting a 172.20.* address everywhere is less confusing/worrisome.



- ToddM
_______________________________________________
HTCondor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@cs.wisc.edu with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users

The archives can be found at:
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/

Â

Â


_______________________________________________
HTCondor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@cs.wisc.edu with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users

The archives can be found at:
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/