[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [HTCondor-users] a segfault at the very onset



On 05/23/2017 04:18 PM, lejeczek wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23/05/17 19:10, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>> On 05/23/2017 12:05 PM, lejeczek wrote:
>>> Is this really the best condor could do? Is this the best practice?
>> If your computer actually requires selinux's level of protection, do you
>> really want to run condor on it?
>>
>>
> I'm not sure I catch your drift - are you saying something like: do you
> want to drive a fast car and have it safe (just in case you know) at the
> same time?
> Or: this car should not be used for driving at all?

No, more like: you are the only one who knows what the "better" selinux
policy for your requirements is, so you are welcome to develop it for
yourself.

HTH,HAND
-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature