Date: | Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:33:24 -0600 (CST) |
---|---|
From: | Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] non-cacheable memory |
> If you are not interested in modeling the memory system affects of issuing > a request to memory, possibly incurring interconnect delays and etc., then > sure, return a fixed number of stall cycles to Simics > This actually won't work. You first need to stall Simics, then after the stall elapses, Simics will ask again if it can proceed and you need to then return a stall of 0. |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] non-cacheable memory, Mike Marty |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] non-cacheable memory, Dave Z. |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] non-cacheable memory, Mike Marty |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] non-cacheable memory, Dave Z. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |