Re: [Gems-users] non-cacheable memory

["Dave Z." <zhu_dave@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > If you are not interested in modeling the memory
> system affects of issuing
> > a request to memory, possibly incurring
> interconnect delays and etc., then
> > sure, return a fixed number of stall cycles to
> Simics
> >
> 
> This actually won't work.  You first need to stall
> Simics, then after the
> stall elapses, Simics will ask again if it can
> proceed and you need to
> then return a stall of 0.
> 

Where does such an implementation take place in Ruby
code (so that I can have an example to take a look)? 

Thanks

Dave


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com