Date: | Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:18:54 -0600 |
---|---|
From: | Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] Garnet with crossbar topology |
You could try to actually /make/ a crossbar out of links and routers using the topology file. You would have to make your own decisions on radix, latency, etc., and you would have to make one 'crossbar' per configuration. Regards, Dan On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Niket Agarwal <niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: If you are planning to use the flexible pipeline and specify the number of pipeline stages, you would be approximating the contention in the crossbar. This is because the model is output queued and flits from multiple input ports can simultaneously enter an output queue. -- http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq! |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Garnet with crossbar topology, Niket Agarwal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Garnet with crossbar topology, Paul Mejia |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Garnet with crossbar topology, Niket Agarwal |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Garnet with crossbar topology, Paul Mejia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |