Re: [Gems-users] Garnet with crossbar topology


Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:51:36 -0800
From: Paul Mejia <pmmejia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] Garnet with crossbar topology
Thanks for the replies.

I have a question on the fixed pipeline model. Why is there a separate
stage for link traversal? If I specify link_latency:1, would the LT
pipeline stage be redundant?

Thanks,
Paul


On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You could try to actually /make/ a crossbar out of links and routers using
> the topology file. You would have to make your own decisions on radix,
> latency, etc., and you would have to make one 'crossbar' per configuration.
>
> Regards,
> Dan
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Niket Agarwal <niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> If you are planning to use the flexible pipeline and specify the number of
>> pipeline stages, you would be approximating the contention in the crossbar.
>> This is because the model is output queued and flits from multiple input
>> ports can simultaneously enter an output queue.
>>
>> -Niket
>>
>> On 2/24/2010 5:34 PM, Paul Mejia wrote:
>>>
>>> I want to model a crossbar network with increased network latency as
>>> the size of the crossbar is increased. Any suggestions on how to do
>>> this? I'm thinking of using a single router and changing the number of
>>> pipeline stages to simulate a multi-cycle switch traversal stage.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Niket Agarwal<niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Garnet is only meant for networks with routers. If you specify a
>>>> crossbar, I
>>>> think the topology would be all-to-all with multiple routers
>>>> instantiated.
>>>> You can check what will happen in ruby/network/simple/Topology.C
>>>>
>>>> On 2/17/2010 1:43 PM, Paul Mejia wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> The GEMS wiki says that the Garnet topology can be specified using the
>>>>> FILE_SPECIFIED format. But can a crossbar be also used via
>>>>> g_NETWORK_TOPOLOGY: CROSSBAR?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Paul
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gems-users mailing list
>>>>> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>>>>> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>>>>> "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gems-users mailing list
>>>> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>>>> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>>>> "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gems-users mailing list
>>> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>>> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>>> "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gems-users mailing list
>> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>> "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
> "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>
>
>
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]