Re: [HTCondor-users] change to condor_submit - user feedback desired! (was Re: multiple condor_submit's - one cluster)

[Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/11/2015 02:27 PM, Carl Edquist wrote:

> Yeah, that makes sense.  I was just saying that's not what I had in
> mind; I was thinking more along the lines of Todd's 2nd proposal, to
> queue based on each line of input (from stdin or a file) and populate
> $(input_line) rather than a queue N and $(process).
> 
> I get why you might want to do it in a dag file format as you described,
> just it seemed like you could accomplish the same thing with
> 
>     queue for jobname,outfile,stdout in listfile.txt
> 
> and listfile.txt containing:
> 
>     myjob1 myjob1.out myjob1.stdout
>     myjob2 myjob2.out myjob2.stdout
>     ...
> 
> which strikes me as easier both to generate and to parse.

Maybe but anyway there's a key difference: one of them already exists.

;)
-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature