[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] Quill Question
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:53:54 -0600
- From: "David A. Kotz" <dkotz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Quill Question
I'd like to verify that you mean 1680 slots, rather than 1680 machines
with multiple slots per machine. I'm considering implementing Quill on
my system, but we have about 1600 slots, so I'm concerned that we might
run into the scaling issues you're seeing.
Henning Fehrmann wrote:
How well has Quill scaled for you in this configuration with thousands
of execute nodes?
We tried Quill on PostgreSQL 8.3 database
with 1680 execute nodes, appr. 30 user and sometimes several 10000 jobs in
the queue. From time to time the access to the database took almost a
minute. Even a direct access to the database took us 10s to list a table
with 600 000 lines.
It was condor v7.0.1. We have not tried it yet with v7.2.0.
We also assume that the database can be tuned.
Condor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
The archives can be found at: